Judicial Elections: A Steppingstone to the Supreme Court
The decisions made by the United States Supreme Court this past year that directly impact marginalized communities is a call to action to vote. By casting your ballot, you are using your voice to demand that our society is fair and equitable for all. Your vote for elected representatives, especially at the local level, can potentially put someone in place who will decide which individual rights and freedoms to protect. Legislative actions such as book banning, purging critical race theory and fact-based education on gender and history, prohibiting drag performances, delaying the end of money bond and dismissing the case for reparations are determined at the local level, but the issues advanced at this level can and often do flow up to state and national campaigns. We must know our local representatives, communicate our values with them and participate in elections at all levels.
Why is voting in local judicial elections important?
Voting in local judicial elections has broad implications for the judicial system as a whole. This is because the intersection between local judicial elections and the United States Supreme Court lies in the potential impact that local judicial elections can have on the composition and direction of the Supreme Court over time. Essentially, judges elected at the local level may eventually become candidates for the Supreme Court, much like how local issues rise to state and national levels.
Although the Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and making decisions for the entire country, the results of local judicial elections also hold weight as they shape the pool of candidates available for nomination to the high court. When a vacancy arises, the president nominates a candidate for the position, and their track record and reputation are closely examined during the nomination and confirmation process.
During the nomination and confirmation process, the track record and reputation of Supreme Court nominees are closely examined. Elected judges at the local level who have gained experience and established a strong reputation for their legal expertise and decision-making may catch the attention of presidents and senators. Accordingly, presidents and senators often evaluate nominees based on judicial records. These judges may be considered as candidates for higher judicial positions, including appellate courts, state supreme courts and the Supreme Court. Judges who have successfully navigated local judicial elections increase their eligibility to be a Supreme Court justice. Therefore, local judicial elections serve as a steppingstone for judges who aspire to reach the highest level of the judiciary.
Additionally, local judicial elections can have an indirect impact on the ideological balance of the Supreme Court. When these judges progress in their careers and become candidates for higher judicial positions, their political and ideological orientations may influence the direction of the Supreme Court if they are nominated and confirmed, emphasizing the importance of voting for those who will represent your values and protect the wellbeing of you and your community members.
How does one become a judge?
Local judicial elections are typically held to fill vacancies in trial courts, district courts and other lower-level courts. These elections allow citizens to participate in the selection of judges who will preside over cases within their communities. The process to become a judge varies across jurisdictions, but it generally involves several common steps. After pursuing legal education and gaining legal qualifications, typically by completing a law degree and passing the bar examination, aspiring judges can apply for judicial vacancies or participate in judicial appointment processes. These processes may involve selection committees, executive appointments or merit-based systems.
The selection process for judges may include comprehensive evaluations of the candidates’ qualifications, legal expertise, temperament and ethical standards. Background checks and interviews are commonly conducted to assess the candidates’ suitability for the position. Candidates for judgeships may be subject to public scrutiny and face elections, where voters directly decide the outcome.
How are judges removed?
Removing a judge from their position, especially a Supreme Court Justice, is a lengthy and challenging process. In the United States, judges can only be removed through impeachment for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which is a rare occurrence. Alternatively, judges may choose to retire, resign, or be disqualified due to incapacity. Misconduct or ethical violations can also lead to removal, but it is a complicated procedure.
The difficulty in removing a judge serves as an essential check and balance, preventing quick or arbitrary removals that could harm the autonomy of the judiciary and expose it to external pressures. A rigorous removal process also helps protect judges from being targeted for making unpopular decisions, ensuring they can dispense justice without fear of retaliation. Additionally, the complexity of the removal process allows experienced judges, especially those on higher courts, to contribute to consistent legal interpretations.
Supreme Court Justices in the United States serve lifelong terms and do not have term limits, which has both advantages and disadvantages. The absence of term limits allows justices to make decisions based solely on the law and the Constitution without concerns about re-election. Lifelong appointments provide continuity and stability to the Supreme Court, fostering a balanced approach to interpreting the law and building expertise over time. However, arguments for term limits suggest that they would increase accountability, prevent prolonged dominance of outdated viewpoints, and reduce the intense political stakes associated with appointing new justices.
Why does voter engagement matter?
Given the connection between local judicial elections and the Supreme Court, it is essential to exercise your right to vote in every election, not only at the state or federal level, to impact policy, law and the future of your community. By participating in elections, you have the power to elect officials who will serve your interests and advance racial, economic and social justice such as through ending money bond and implementing reparations.
Knowing your local representatives, communicating your values with them and actively participating in elections at all levels are essential steps in advocating for the rights and well-being of marginalized communities. By supporting candidates who prioritize inclusivity, equality and justice, voters can work towards creating a more inclusive and just society. Voter engagement and activism are vital components of the democratic process and can be powerful tools in promoting positive change.
Take Action
Read our blog articles to learn more about why voting matters and the ongoing struggle for achieving voting rights.
Follow our Facebook and Instagram to stay up to date on future local decisions and Supreme Court rulings.
Take our Voter Pledge to join the CRS My Congregation Votes Campaign.
Disclaimer: This article was written with the help of the ChatGPT language model developed by OpenAI.